I'm a Dedicated Free-Market Advocate, Yet Medicare for All Represents the Top Hope for US Healthcare

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. FSA. HRA. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Nor the typical worker. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for our business – or for our families – seems like it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

Our Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It's Costly

Based on a recent study, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (up 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently the government has ceased functioning due to political disagreements over tax credits which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system doesn't change. The way medical professionals receive payment would change. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would need contributions from both employees and employers. In similar programs, an employee earning moderate income pays approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company pays approximately 13.75%.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you compare that with what average US resident spends. I know dozens of businesses who are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that in comprehensive systems, those payments also cover pension plans, illness coverage, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to funding healthcare facilities. When you add those costs compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Implementation for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than those earning less. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of federal military, technology, social programs and transportation services, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators instead of a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would place us on a level playing field with our larger competitors that can pay for superior coverage. It would make management much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to retirement and Medicare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses our yearly costs, instead of going through the complicated (and fruitless) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage among workers – as opposed to the current system which require them to interpret the complications of current options. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for employers since we wouldn't have access to our employees' medical records for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. But I've learned that government has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses which hire the majority of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. And I realize that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where big changes can be readily adopted. However extending Medicare for all, despite increased taxation required, would still be a superior and more affordable strategy for not only managing medical expenses but providing access for all citizens.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must reduce national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank well below numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, based on comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot amid present circumstances could be that we undertake a hard look at ourselves and agree that big changes are necessary.

Claire Byrd
Claire Byrd

A passionate gamer and writer with over a decade of experience in esports and game development, sharing insights to help players excel.